LANDMARK CASE LAW
Recent Landmark Judgments
Selected 2026 decisions from the Supreme Court of India's official Landmark Judgment Summaries. Summaries below are for legal awareness; read the full judgment before relying on any proposition.
SUPREME COURT · 2 JULY 2026 · 2026 INSC 668
Pooja Ramesh Singh v. Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd.
AI-generated authorities: The Court held that fake or hallucinated precedent cannot be allowed to contaminate adjudication, set aside the affected decisions, and called for accountability where unverified AI-generated material is cited.
Official summary / judgment →
SUPREME COURT · 27 MAY 2026 · 2026 INSC 564
Association for Democratic Reforms v. Election Commission of India
Electoral rolls: The Court considered the legality of Bihar's Special Intensive Revision, the Election Commission's powers, electoral eligibility and the limits of its inquiry concerning citizenship.
Official summary / judgment →
SUPREME COURT · 11 MARCH 2026 · 2026 INSC 222
Harish Rana v. Union of India
Right to die with dignity: The decision addresses passive euthanasia, withdrawal of clinically assisted nutrition and hydration, the patient's best interests and streamlining the Common Cause framework.
Official summary / judgment →
SUPREME COURT · 10 FEBRUARY 2026 · 2026 INSC 165
In Re: Order dated 17.03.2025 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Sexual offences: The Court revisited the distinction between preparation and attempt and directed expert work toward a more sensitive and compassionate judicial approach in sexual-offence and vulnerable-person cases.
Official summary / judgment →
SUPREME COURT · 9 FEBRUARY 2026 · 2026 INSC 138
Deputy Commissioner & Special Land Acquisition Officer v. M/s S.V. Global Mill Ltd.
Land acquisition & limitation: The Court held that Section 5 of the Limitation Act is not excluded from first appeals under Section 74 of the 2013 land acquisition legislation and directed a pragmatic approach to delay-condonation applications.
Official summary / judgment →
The short notes on Jury Hammer are educational summaries, not headnotes and not a substitute for the judgment text. Verify citations and propositions from the official judgment before use in pleadings or court.